- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 5 December 2023
- Bench
- G.Ilangovan
- Case no.
- CRL OP(MD) 15428/2023
Judgment
ORDER This criminal original petition has been filed seeking direction to the 2nd respondent to give adequate police protection to the petitioners life and limb on the basis of the petitioner representation dated
14.08.2023 within time frame fixed by this Court.
2.According to the counsel for the petitioner, the third respondent was convicted in a murder case, wherein, and sentenced to undergo life imprisonment. After serving of sentence period, now he is released from the prison and frequently coming to his house and making trouble. The third respondent is present before this Court today and stated that because of some issue over landed property, trouble has arisen between them. Now, he is in Chennai. He assured that he will not make any trouble to the petitioner in future. To that effect, he has also filed an undertaking affidavit. Based upon the undertaking affidavit, advising the parties maintain the peace, the complaint was closed.
3.In view of the above, this criminal original petition stands disposed of, as nothing survives for further consideration.
05.12.2023 NCC : Index : Internet : TM To
1.The Commissioner of Police, Madurai, Madurai City.
2.The Inspector of Police, Thiruppalai Police Station, Madurai District.
3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. G.ILANGOVAN
,J.
TM
05.12.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:05.12.2023 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN P.Sakthivel ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Commissioner of Police, Madurai, Madurai City. 2.The Inspector of Police, Thiruppalai Police Station, Madurai District. 3.Kannan ...Respondents PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, to directing the 2nd respondent to give adequate police protection to the petitioners life and limb on the basis of the petitioner representation dated 14.08.2023 within time frame fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Pugalendhi For R1 & R2 : Mr.M.Vaikkam Karunanithi Government Advocate (Crl.side) For R3 : Mr.G.S.Senthil Kumar
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.