- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 5 July 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 6877/2015
Judgment
ORDER The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner informs the Court that the matter has become infructuous. This writ petition is dismissed accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
05.07.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No NCC : Yes / No MGA To
1.The Home Secretary, Secretariat, St.George Fort, Chennai -9.
2.The Director General of Police, D.G.P.Office, Chennai.
3.The Inspector General of Police, South Zone, IG Office, Madurai, Madurai District.
4.The Superintendent of Police, District Police Office,
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. MGA
5.The District Collector, District Collector Office,
6.The Inspector of Police, Cheriruveli Village, Mudukulathur Taluk, and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2015
05.07.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 05.07.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2015 K.S.Raja ... Petitioner Vs 1.The Home Secretary, Secretariat, St.George Fort, Chennai -9. 2.The Director General of Police, D.G.P.Office, Chennai. 3.The Inspector General of Police, South Zone, IG Office, Madurai, Madurai District. 4.The Superintendent of Police, District Police Office, 5.The District Collector, District Collector Office, 6.The President, National Board of Alternative Medicines, Melachetti Street, Kuttalam, Nagappattinam District. 7.The Inspector of Police, Cheriruveli Village, Mudukulathur Taluk, ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the second respondent herein to give suitable direction to 4th and 7th respondents herein not to interfere into the petitioners practice in alterative medicines as well as acupuncture, in the light of the petitioner's representation, dated 09.04.2015 as well as fifth respondents communication dated 07.06.2013 within a stipulated period as may be fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Sundar For Respondents : Mr.NGA.Natraj Government Advocate for R.1 to R.5 & R.7 No Appearance for R.6
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.