- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 5 July 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 7102/2015
Judgment
ORDER Heard the learned counsel on either side.
¶2When the matter was taken up for hearing, it is submitted by the respondents that Police protection was given and survey was done two weeks back and boundary stones were also installed. A flag pole of one political party installed in the land was also removed. Nothing survives for further adjudication.
¶3This writ petition is disposed of accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
05.07.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No NCC : Yes / No MGA To
1.The District Collector Madurai District, Madurai.
2.The Revenue Divisional Officer Usilampatti, Madurai.
3.The Tahsildar Peraiyur Taluk, Madurai District.
4.The Inspector of Police Peraiyur Police Station, Madurai District.
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. MGA and MP(MD)No.1 of 2015
05.07.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 05.07.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and MP(MD)No.1 of 2015 Karunaimani ... Petitioner Vs 1.The District Collector Madurai District, Madurai. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer Usilampatti, Madurai. 3.The Tahsildar Peraiyur Taluk, Madurai District. 4.The Inspector of Police Peraiyur Police Station, Madurai District. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the third respondent herein to install the boundary stones and consequently directing the fourth respondent herein to provide adequate police protection for the installation of the boundary stones in the petitioner's property situated at S.No.264/11 at Melapatti, Santhaiyur Village, Peraiyur Taluk, Madurai District within the time stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.N.Mariappan For Respondents : Mr.D.Gandhiraj Special Government Pleader
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.