R.Vijayalakshmi v. Rathna Benefit Funds Ltd

ORDER The learned counsel for the revision petitioners would submit that the prayer sought for by the petitioners has become infructuous. He had also made an endorsement to that effect.

2.Recording the same, the Civil Revision Petition stands dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

19.04.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No vsd To

1.The Subordinate Judge, Sivakasi.

2.The Section Officer, Vernacular Records, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

P.VADAMALAI, J. vsd

and C.M.P(MD)No.1378 of 2018

19.04.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 19.04.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VADAMALAI and C.M.P(MD)No.1378 of 2018 1.R.Vijayalakshmi 2.R.Senthil Kumar 3.Kamalajothi ... Petitioners Vs. 1.Rathna Benefit Funds Ltd., through one of its Director, Lakshmanan, Sattur Town, Virudhunagar District. 2.J.Murugesan 3.Dhanasekaran Pandiyan 4.Dhayala Mohan ...Respondents PRAYER : Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, to direct the Subordinate Judge, Sivakasi to take the unnumbered E.A.SR.No.2409 of 2018 in E.P.No.25 of 2015 in I.A.No. 129 of 2010 in O.S.No.73 of 2010 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Sivakasi and dispose of the same on merits. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Parthasarathy