Anilkumar, v. The District Collctor

ORDER The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the prayer in the writ petition has become infructuous.

2.Recording the same, the Writ Petition is closed. However, there shall be no order as to costs.

Speaking : Yes / No

27.02.2023 NCC : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No Index : Yes / No mm To

1.The District Collector, Kanyakumari District, Nagercoil.

2.The Superintendent of Police,

3.The Inspector of Police, Kollencode Police Station,

K.KUMARESH BABU, J.

mm

27.02.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 27.02.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU Anilkumar ... Petitioner /vs./ 1.The District Collector, Kanyakumari District, Nagercoil. 2.The Superintendent of Police, 3.The Inspector of Police, Kollencode Police Station, ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the respondents from putting the petitioner as a goonda upon foisting false cases by considering the petitioner's representation dated 23.04.2015. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Sivakumar For R1 : Mr.M.Prakash Additional Government Pleader For R2 & R3 : Mr.R.M.S.Sethuraman Additional Public Prosecutor