K.Chinnadurai,S/O M. Kaliappan v. The Director of Panchayat,

ORDER None appears for the writ petitioner.

¶2The case is posted under the caption "for dismissal". I went through the averments set out in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition.

¶3The fourth respondent has filed counter affidavit and the learned Additional Government Pleader took me through its contents.

¶4From a reading of the materials on record, it is obvious that the petitioner is having a private civil dispute with the contesting respondents herein. The question of invoking writ jurisdiction in such matters will not arise. The petitioner has to necessarily go before the jurisdictional civil Court for establishing his rights.

¶5With this liberty to the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

14.07.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No NCC : Yes / No MGA To

1.The Director of Panchayat, Director of Panchayat Office, Kuralagam Building, Parrys, Chennai.

2.The District Collector,

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. MGA

3.The Assistant Director of Panchayat, Assistant Director Office, 3rd Floor, Collectorate Complex,

4.The Executive Officer, First Grade Panchayat, Nainanagaram, Tenkasi Taluk, and W.M.P(MD)No.1 of 2015

14.07.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 14.07.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and W.M.P(MD)No.1 of 2015 K.Chinnadurai ... Petitioner Vs 1.The Director of Panchayat, Director of Panchayat Office, Kuralagam Building, Parrys, Chennai. 2.The District Collector, 3.The Assistant Director of Panchayat, Assistant Director Office, 3rd Floor, Collectorate Complex, 4.The Executive Officer, First Grade Panchayat, Nainanagaram, Tenkasi Taluk, 5.V.Ramasamy 6.E.Karuppasamy 7.S.Muthu ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated on 28.03.2015 and direct the respondents 3 and 4 to cancel the layout plan recognition granted by the fourth respondent in vide No. 3/2011 dated 16.09.2011. For Petitioner : Mr.C.Baskaran For Respondents : Mr.N.Satheesh Kumar Additional Government Pleader for R.1 to R.3 Mr.K.Guru for R.4 Mr.N.Ganagasapapathy for R.5 No Appearance for R.6 & R.7