- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 22 August 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 7885/2015
Judgment
ORDER The main counsel who filed this writ petition is no more. It is submitted that the letter sent to the petitioner did not elicit any response.
2.I went through the contents of the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition. It pertains to auction of shops belonging to municipality. The period also has long since lapsed and nothing survives for further adjudication in this writ petition. Hence, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
22.08.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No ias
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. ias
22.08.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 22.08.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and M.P.(MD)Nos.1 and 2 of 2015 T.S.G.Manickam ... Petitioner Vs. The Commissioner, Kumbakonam Municipality, Kumbakonam, Thanjavur District. ... Respondent Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the resolution Nos.11 to 15 dated 30.04.2015 on the file of the respondent herein and also further direct the respondent to conduct re-auction for the shops belonging to the respondent municipality. For Petitioner : Mr.S.P.Maharajan
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.