Murugesan v. The District Collector,

O R D E R The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.

2.In view of the submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.

03.03.2023 NCC :Yes/No Index :Yes/No Internet :Yes/No Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order sbn To

1.The District Collector, Tiruchirappalli District, Tiruchirappalli.

2.The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Manapparai.

3.The Commissioner, Vaiyampatti Panchayat Union, Vaiyampatti, Manapparai Taluk, Tiruchirappalli District.

K.KUMARESH BABU, J. sbn W.P.(MD).No.7907 of 2015

03.03.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :03.03.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K. KUMARESH BABU W.P.(MD).No.7907 of 2015 Murugesan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Tiruchirappalli District, Tiruchirappalli. 2.The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Manapparai. 3.The Commissioner, Vaiyampatti Panchayat Union, Vaiyampatti, Manapparai Taluk, Tiruchirappalli District. ... Respondents PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the second and third respondents not to evict the petitioner from his shop located at Santhaipettai, Karur Road, Vaiyampatti, forcibly and except under due process of law based on the representation dated 29.04.2015 given by the petitioner to the third respondent. For Petitioner :Mr.T.M.Madasamy For Respondents :Mr.M.Prakash Additional Government Pleader