S.Thangavel v. Arumugam

ORDER The order passed by this Court has been complied with. The petitioner has been informed that he is not eligible for getting provisional pension. The petitioner has liberty to challenge the same in the manner known to law.

¶2With this liberty to the petitioner, this contempt petition stands closed.

06.11.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No NCC : Yes / No MGA

To

1.The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Madurai) Limited, Bypass Road, Madurai – 16.

2.The General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Madurai) Limited, Dindigul Region, Dindigul – 4.

3.The Administrator, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Employees Pension Fund Trust, Thiruvalluvar Illam, Pallavan Salai, Chennai – 2.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. MGA in W.P(MD)No.64 of 2022

06.11.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 06.11.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN in W.P(MD)No.64 of 2022 S.Thangavel ... Petitioner / Petitioner Vs. 1.Arumugam, Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Madurai) Limited, Bypass Road, Madurai – 16. 2.Sivalingam, General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Madurai) Limited, Dindigul Region, Dindigul – 4. 3.Bhama, Administrator, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Employees Pension Fund Trust, Thiruvalluvar Illam, Pallavan Salai, Chennai – 2. ... Contemnors/ Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the respondents for committing contempt for the willful disobedience of the order in W.P(MD)No.64 of 2022 dated 27.06.2023. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Govindan For Respondent : Mr.S.C.Herold Singh Standing Counsel for R.3