S.Ahamed Kani, v. The District Collector,

ORDER None appears for the writ petitioner.

¶2The third respondent herein is the petitioner's maternal aunt. She is said to have filed revision before the second respondent. In the typed set of papers, a copy of the enquiry notice dated 16.02.2015 is enclosed.

¶3The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the official respondents clarifies that till date the proceedings are still pending. That is probably because of the pendency of this writ petition.

¶4The petitioner's request is that the Revenue Divisional Officer must reject the third respondent's request and relegate her to move jurisdictional civil Court. This call has to be taken by the second respondent. At this stage, the writ Court will not be justified in suggesting to the second respondent as to the nature of the order she/he must pass.

¶5I direct the second respondent to conclude the petition mentioned enquiry proceedings and pass final order on merits and in accordance with law after notice to all the concerned parties. This shall be done within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. I make it clear that I have not gone into the merits of the matter.

¶6This writ petition is disposed of accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

07.07.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No NCC : Yes / No MGA To

1.The District Collector, Ramanathapuram.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Revenue Divisional Office, Ramanathapuram.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. MGA and W.M.P(MD)No.1 of 2015

07.07.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 07.07.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and W.M.P(MD)No.1 of 2015 S.Ahamed Kani ... Petitioner Vs 1.The District Collector, Ramanathapuram. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Revenue Divisional Office, Ramanathapuram. 3.M.Fathima Beevi ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 20.05.2015 pertaining to the proceedings vide Na.Ka.No.A5:1239/2013 on the file of the second respondent. For Petitioner : Mr.V.Vinayaga Moorthy For Respondents : Mr.N.Satheesh Kumar Additional Government Pleader for R.1 & R.2