M.Veeranathevar v. The District Revenue Officer

ORDER Heard the learned counsel on either side.

¶2The learned counsel appearing for the third respondent brings it to my notice that after filing the present writ petition, the petitioner Veeranathevar filed O.S.No.121 of 2016 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Peraiyur and that the suit was dismissed on merits on 28.10.2021. The suit schedule pertains to Survey No.73/5, Kallampatti Village, Peraiyur Taluk. The writ petition is also pertaining to the same property. In as much as the suit filed by the petitioner suffered dismissal, the present writ petition has to be closed.

¶3The Writ Petition is closed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also closed.

19.09.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No rmi To

1.The District Revenue Officer, Madurai District, Madurai.

2.The Tahsildar, Peraiyur Taluk, Peraiyur, Madurai District.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. rmi

19.09.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 19.09.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.1 & 2 of 2015 M.Veeranathevar ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Revenue Officer, Madurai District, Madurai. 2.The Tahsildar, Peraiyur Taluk, Peraiyur, Madurai District. 3.M.Periyapandi (died) P.Perumayee (This Court vide order dated 19.09.2023 substituted P.Perumayee as 3rd respondent in the place of M.Periyapandi) ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the 1st respondent in proceedings No. Na.Ka.No. 34930/2014/G5 dated 19.11.2014 and of the 2nd respondent in proceedings No. Pa.Mu.No. B2/11536/2013 dated 07.01.2015 and quash the same and further direct the respondents 1 and 2 to restore the patta in the name of the Kathandammal Kovil. For Petitioner : Mr.S.K.C.Ramalingam For Respondents : Mr.D.Gandhiraj Special Government Pleader for R1 & R2 : Ms.W.Pamelin for R3