Hathoon Ammal, v. The District Revenue

ORDER The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the writ petition.

¶2In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.

05.09.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No rmi To

1.The District Revenue Officer, O/o. District Revenue Officer, Ramanthapuram.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, O/o. Revenue Divisional Officer, Ramanathapuram.

3.The Tahsildar, O/o.Tahsildar District, Ramanathapuram Taluk, Ramanthapuram.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. rmi

05.09.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 05.09.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN Hathoon Ammal ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Revenue Officer, O/o. District Revenue Officer, Ramanthapuram. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, O/o. Revenue Divisional Officer, Ramanathapuram. 3.The Tahsildar, O/o.Tahsildar District, Ramanathapuram Taluk, Ramanthapuram. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the Impugned orders passed by the 1st respondent in Pa.Moo.54475/2014 (B6) dated 16.02.2015 and quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the respondents to consider the re-classify of the land from "Temple Poramboke" to the legal heir of the petitioner's father namely PMS Mohamed Moideen. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Senthil Kumar For Respondents : Mr.N.Satheeshkumar Additional Government Pleader