- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 2 March 2023
- Bench
- K.Kumaresh Babu
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 9684/2015
Judgment
O R D E R When the matter was taken up for hearing, it is submitted that the prayer that has been sought for has become infructuous. Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
02.03.2023 NCC :Yes/No Index :Yes/No Internet :Yes/No sbn To
1.The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai.
2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Usilampatti Division, Madurai District.
3.The Tahsildar, Tirumangalam Taluk, Madurai District.
4.Mr.Paulraj, Village Administrative Office, Melakkottai Village, Madurai District.
K.KUMARESH BABU, J. sbn W.P.(MD).No.9684
of 2015
02.03.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :02.03.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K. KUMARESH BABU W.P.(MD).No.9684 of 2015 Thangadurai ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Usilampatti Division, Madurai District. 3.The Tahsildar, Tirumangalam Taluk, Madurai District. 4.Mr.Paulraj, Village Administrative Office, Melakkottai Village, Madurai District. ... Respondents PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to take appropriate legal action against the fourth respondent on or before 30.06.2015 in accordance with law by considering the petitioner's representation dated 27.04.2015. For Petitioner :Mr.A.Arun Prasad For Respondents :Mrs.D.Farjana Ghoushia Special Government Pleader for R1 to R3 :No appearance for R4
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.