VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

M/S.Nvk Mohamed Suthan Rowther and Sons v. The Agricultural Production Commissioner and

DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
24 August 2023
Bench
B.Pugalendhiauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 22783/2022

Judgment

O R D E R This writ petition is filed as against the show cause notice issued by the third respondent on 05.09.2022, directing the petitioner to obtain license under Section 8(1) of Tamil nadu Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1987 and to pay the appropriate market fee under Section 24 of the Act.

2.Today(24.08.2023), when this writ petition is taken up for hearing, the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the prayer sought for by the petitioner in this writ petition has become infructuous and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.

3.Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is closed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

24.08.2023 NCC : Yes / No. Index : Yes / No. Internet : Yes / No. vrn To

1.The Agricultural Production Commissioner and Secretary to Government, Agriculture and Farmers Welfare Department, Chennai.

2.The Secretary, Department of Agricultural Marketing and Agri Business, Dindigul Marketing Committee, Dindigul District.

3.The Superintendent, Regulated Market, Dindigul Marketing Committee, Department of Agricultural Marketing and Agri Business, Dindigul – 624 001. W.P(MD)No.22783eofe2023 B.PUGALENDHI,oJ vrn Orderomadeoin W.P(MD)oNo.22783oofo2022oand WMP(MD)oNos.16928o&o16929oofo2022

24.08.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 24.08.2023 CORAM : THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI W.P(MD) No.22783 of 2022 and WMP(MD) Nos.16928 & 16929 of 2022 M/s.NVK Mohamed Sulthan Rowthar & Sons, Represented by its Managing Director, 95, Market Road, Dindigul – 624 001. Petitioner Vs. 1.The Agricultural Production Commissioner and Secretary to Government, Agriculture and Farmers Welfare Department, Chennai. 2.The Secretary, Department of Agricultural Marketing and Agri Business, Dindigul Marketing Committee, Dindigul District. 3.The Superintendent, Regulated Market, Dindigul Marketing Committee, Department of Agricultural Marketing and Agri Business, Dindigul – 624 001. Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the show cause notice dated 05.09.2022 in Na.Ka.No.35/2022 issued by the third respondent to the petitioner and to quash the same and consequently to forbear the respondents from in any way insisting upon the petitioner for a license to be taken for purchase and sale of Arecanut within Dindigul Regulated Market under the Provisions of the Tamil Nadu Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1987. For Petitioner :Mr.Y.Prakash For Respondents :Mr.Veerakathiravan, Additional Advocate General Assisted by Mr.M.Sarangan, Additional Government Pleader

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.