- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 19 June 2023
- Bench
- P.Vadamalai
- Case no.
- CRP(MD) 1426/2018
Judgment
ORDER The learned counsel for the respondent has already filed a memo stating that the suit in O.S.No.80 of 2011 on the file of the Additional District Munsif Court was ''dismissed for default'' on 10.04.2023 and hence this Civil Revision Petition has become infructuous. The said memo is recorded.
¶2In view of the same, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected Civil Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
19.06.2023 NCC : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No Index : Yes/No vsd To
1.The Additional District Munsif, Srivilliputtur.
2.The Section Officer, Vernacular Records, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
P.VADAMALAI, J. vsd
and C.M.P(MD)No.6141 of 2018
19.06.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 19.06.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VADAMALAI and C.M.P(MD)No.6141 of 2018 N.Gurusamy @ Dharmar ... Petitioner Vs. K.Yerakkammal ... Respondent PRAYER : Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to setaside the fair and decreetal order passed in I.A.No.84 of 2018 in O.S.No.80 of 2011 on the file of the Additional District Munsif, Srivilliputtur dated 26.02.2018 by allowing the Civil Revision Petition. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Ashok Kumar For Respondent : Mr.L.Prabhu
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.