VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Muniasamy.S v. The District Collector

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
30 March 2023
Bench
G.R.Swaminathanauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 22898/2022

Judgment

ORDER The petitioner questions the impugned order of suspension dated

05.08.2021. When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel produced the copy of the proceedings dated 17.03.2023 indicating revocation of the suspension order.

¶2Recording the subsequent development, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

30.03.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No rmi To

1.The District Collector, Tenkasi District, Collectorate, Tenkasi.

2.The Personal Assistant (Development), To District Collector, Tenkasi District, Tenkasi.

3.The Special Officer of Thenmalai Village Panchayat / Block Development Officer (Village Panchayat), O/o the Vasudevanallur Panchayat Union, Vasudevanallur Post, Tenkasi District.

4.The President, Thenmalai Village Panchayat, Sivagiri Taluk, Tenkasi District.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. rmi

30.03.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 30.03.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN S.Muniasamy ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Tenkasi District, Collectorate, Tenkasi. 2.The Personal Assistant (Development), To District Collector, Tenkasi District, Tenkasi. 3.The Special Officer of Thenmalai Village Panchayat / Block Development Officer (Village Panchayat), O/o the Vasudevanallur Panchayat Union, Vasudevanallur Post, Tenkasi District. 4.The President, Thenmalai Village Panchayat, Sivagiri Taluk, Tenkasi District. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records in pursuant to the impugned suspension order passed by the third respondent in her proceedings Na.Ka.No.Aa6/66/2021, dated 05.08.2021 and the consequential order passed in Na.Ka.No.Aa6/66/2021, dated 10.12.2021 and quash the same and consequently, direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner in service by treating the period of suspension as duty-period and to grant all attendant and monetary benefits. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Saravanakumar For Respondents : Mr.G.Suriyananth Additional Government Pleader for R1 & R2 :Mr.P.Subbaraj Special Government Pleader for R3 & R4

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.