- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 25 July 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 9888/2015
Judgment
ORDER The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner does not have instructions.
¶2The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent submits that the pledged jewels were returned to the petitioner as early as on
15.11.2016. Recording the said submission, this writ petition is closed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
25.07.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No NCC : Yes / No MGA
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. MGA
25.07.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 25.07.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN D.Samikannu ... Petitioner Vs The Branch Manager, Indian Overseas Bank, Main Road, South Vijayanarayanam, Nanguneri Taluk. ... Respondent Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to return back the petitioner's jewells and close the petitioner's loan account. For Petitioner : Mr.V.Meenakshisundaram For Respondent : Mr.N.Dhilip Kumar Standing Counsel
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.