Somasundaram v. The Superintendent of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 01.09.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE D.NAGARJUN Crl.O.P.(MD) No.15424 of 2023 Somasundaram ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police, Cuddalore District.

2.The Inspector of Police, Parangipettai Police Station (Porte Nova), Cuddalore District.

3.Saravanan ..Respondents PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to execute the Bailable Warrant pending against the third respondent issued by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.IV, Trichy in S.T.C.No.431 of 2016, within a time frame fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.R.S.Sivaram For R1 and R2 : Mr.B.Thanga Aravindh Government Advocate (crl.side) O R D E R

This Criminal Original Petition is filed seeking for a direction to the respondents 1 and 2 Police to execute a bailable warrant issued against the third respondent in S.T.C.No.431 of 2016 pending on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.IV, Tiruchirappalli.

¶2It is submitted that the petitioner has filed a complaint before the learned

Judicial

Magistrate

No.IV,

Tiruchirappalli,

in S.T.C.No.431 of 2016 alleging that the respondent No.3 has committed the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act. It is submitted that the concerned Magistrate has issued the bailable warrant against the third respondent for securing his presence and the said warrant is pending since April 2021 and on account of non-execution of bailable warrant, the matter could not be proceeded with. Therefore, he sought for suitable directions.

¶3The learned Government Advocate criminal side appearing for the respondents Police, on the other hand, submits that the respondents Police did not have any warrant with them and in case if fresh warrant is issued asking the respondents Police to execute the same, the respondents Police would execute the warrant within a time frame fixed by the Court.

¶4Considering the submission made by both sides, the petitioner is directed to move an application before the trial Court and see that the warrant is issued to the accused. On receipt of warrant, the respondents Police are directed to execute the same within a period of four weeks thereafter as it is reported that the respondent No.3 is a Government employee and available.

¶5With these observations, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of. Index : Yes/No

01.09.2023 Internet : Yes/No ssb To

1.The Superintendent of Police, Cuddalore District.

2.The Inspector of Police, Parangipettai Police Station (Porte Nova), Cuddalore District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. DR.D.NAGARJUN. J.

ssb

01.09.2023