VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Senthilkumar v. The Inspector of Police

DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
29 November 2023
Bench
G.Ilangovanauthor
Case no.
CRL OP(MD) 17561/2022

Judgment

ORDER This Criminal Original Petition is filed to call for the records relating to the FIR in Cr.No.9 of 2021 dated 5.5.2021 on the file of the 1st Respondent quash the same as against the Petitioner/Accused no.8 is concerned.

¶2Learned Government Advocate submitted that in this case, final report was filed before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.1, Tirunelveli on 03.05.2023 and the same was taken cognizance in C.C.No.1850 of 2023.

¶3In view of the developments, the matter has become infructuous. Liberty is granted to the petitioner to work out remedy through appropriate proceedings, if he is aggrieved over the contents of the final report.

4.With the above said liberty, this criminal original petition is dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

29.11.2023 NCC : Index : Internet : pnn To

1.The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Tirunelveli District. (Crime No.9/2021).

2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. G.ILANGOVAN

,J.

pnn

29.11.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:29.11.2023 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN and Crl.M.P.(MD).No.11862 of 2022 Senthilkumar ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Tirunelveli District. (Crime No.9/2021). 2.Bagavathi ... Respondents PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, to call for the records relating to the FIR in Cr.No.9 of 2021 dated 5.5.2021 on the file of the 1st Respondent Quash the same as against the Petitioner/Accused no.8 is concern. For Petitioner : Mr.C.Susi Kumar For R1 : Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar Government Advocate (Crl.side)

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.