VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Muthu Krishnan v. The Inspector of Police

DISMISSED FOR NON-PROSECUTION
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
9 November 2023
Bench
G.Ilangovanauthor
Case no.
CRL OP(MD) 15644/2023

Judgment

ORDER This Criminal Original Petition filed to call for the records pertaining to the FIR in Cr.No.796/2020 on the file of the R1 police and quash the same as illegal.

¶2When the matter was taken up for hearing on 22.09.2023 and

05.10.2023, the learned counsel for the petitioner sought adjournments and the case was posted to 20.10.2023. On 20.10.2023 also, learned counsel for the petitioner was not ready for arguments and sought adjournment. Therefore, the matter was adjournment to 09.11.2023. Again it was listed today(09.11.2023) and the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks adjournment.

¶3Inspite of repeated adjournments, learned counsel for the petitioner is not ready to argue the matter. I find no reason to adjourn the matter any further. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed for non prosecution.

09.11.2023 NCC : Index : Internet : pnn To

1.The Inspector of Police, Perumalpuram Police Station, Tirunelveli District. (Crime No.796 of 2020)

2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. G.ILANGOVAN

,J.

pnn

09.11.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 09.11.2023 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN Muthu Krishnan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.State rep by The Inspector of Police, Perumalpuram Police Station, Tirunelveli District. (Crime No.796 of 2020) 2.Vaikundarajan ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, to call for the records pertaining to the FIR in Cr.No.796/2020 on the file of the R1 police and quash the same as illegal. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Althafsheriff For R1 : Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar Government Advocate (Crl.side) For R2 : No appearance

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.