P.Sarasurani v. The Additional Chief Secretary to Government

ORDER [Order of the Court was made by M.S.RAMESH, J.] The petitioner is the mother of the detenu viz., Sugumar, S/o.Pandiyarajan, aged about 30 years. The detenu has been detained by the second respondent by order in B.C.D.F.G.I.S.S.S.V.No.61/2022, dated

10.09.2022, holding him to be a 'Goonda', as contemplated under Section 2(f) of Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982. The said order is under challenge in this Habeas Corpus Petition.

¶2We have heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents. We have also perused the records produced by the Detaining Authority.

¶3Among other grounds, the detention order is mainly attacked on the ground that there is a delay in passing the order of detention. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner strongly contended that though the detenu was arrested on 05.07.2022, the detention order was passed only on

10.09.2022 i.e., after a considerable delay of more than two months. Therefore, the detention order has to be set aside.

¶4The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that on completion of investigation, charge sheet has been filed in S.C.No.412 of 2022 and is pending before the learned I Additional District Judge,

¶5As seen from the grounds of detention, it is clear that though the detenu was arrested on 05.07.2022, the order of detention came to be passed only on 10.09.2022 and hence, there is an abnormal delay in passing the order of Detention, which caused prejudice to the interest of the detenu.

¶6We have gone through the entire materials placed on record. There is no satisfactory explanation offered by the Detaining Authority for the delay in passing the order of detention. Hence the impugned order of detention is liable to be set aside.

¶7In the result, the Habeas Corpus Petition is allowed and the order of detention in B.C.D.F.G.I.S.S.S.V.No.61/2022, dated 10.09.2022, passed by the second respondent is set aside. The detenu, viz., Sugumar, S/o.Pandiyarajan, aged about 30 years, is directed to be released forthwith unless his detention is required in connection with any other case. (M.S.R., J.) (M.N.K., J.)

11.07.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order mbi To

1.The Additional Chief Secretary to Government, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Secretariat, Chennai - 600 009.

2.The District Collector and District Magistrate, O/o.The District Collector and District Magistrate, Madurai - 625 020.

3.The Superintendent of Prison, Central Prison,

4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, H.C.P(MD)No.1650oofo2022 M.S.RAMESH,oJ. and M.NIRMALoKUMAR,oJ. mbi H.C.P(MD)No.1650oofo2022

11.07.2023 Pageg6gofg6

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 11.07.2023 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH AND THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR P.Sarasurani .. Petitioner vs. 1.State of Tamil Nadu, The Additional Chief Secretary to Government, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Secretariat, Chennai - 600 009. 2.The District Collector and District Magistrate, O/o.The District Collector and District Magistrate, Madurai - 625 020. 3.The Superintendent of Prison, Central Prison, ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of habeas corpus calling for the entire records in detention order passed in B.C.D.F.G.I.S.S.S.V.No.61/2022, dated 10.09.2022 on the file of the second respondent herein and set aside the same as illegal and direct the respondents to produce the body or person of the petitioner's son namely Sugumar, S/o.Pandiyarajan, male, aged 30 years, who is detained in Central Prison, Madurai before this Court and set him at liberty. For Petitioner : Mr.K.A.S.Prabhu For respondents : Mr.A.Thiruvadi Kumar, Additional Public Prosecutor