VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

T.B.Srinivasan v. T.Muruganandam

DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
6 December 2023
Bench
K.Murali Shankarauthor
Case no.
CRP(MD) 3168/2023

Judgment

Judgment Debtor Prayer : This Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 C.P.C., to set aside the order dated 21.03.2023 ordering notice to respondent in E.P.No. 38 of 2023 in O.S.No.445 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the First Additional District Munsif/Executing Court, Tiruchirappalli and allow the civil revision petition. For Petitioner : Mr.S.C.Herold Singh ORDER The Civil Revision Petition has been filed challenging the order of the Executing Court in ordering notice to the respondent/judgment debtor.

¶2The learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioner/decree holder would submit that the revision petitioner/decree holder has filed a suit in O.S.No.445 of 2015 for recovery of possession and the suit was decreed on 17.11.2022, that the revision petitioner/decree holder has then laid an execution petition in E.P.No.38 of 2023 and that since the execution petition was laid within two years from the date of judgment and decree, the trial Court as per Order 21 Rule 22 C.P.C. should have passed an order for delivery but instead the Executing Court has ordered for issuance of notice.

¶3At the outset, it is pertinent to note that it is not mandatory on the part of the Executing Court to pass orders without issuing notice, if the execution petition is laid within two years from the date of judgment and decree. More importantly, in the present case, the respondent/judgment debtor has remained ex parte and the trial Court has passed the ex parte judgment and decree on 17.11.2022.

¶4Considering the above, the Executing Court has rightly decided to issue notice to the respondent/judgment debtor before ordering the relief claimed in the execution petition.

¶5Since there is no legal mandate for passing orders directly, the impugned order directing issuance of notice cannot be found fault with. Hence, this Court concludes that the revision is absolutely devoid of merit and the same is liable to be dismissed.

¶6In the result, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. No costs.

06.12.2023 NCC :yes/No Index :yes/No Internet:yes/No csm To

¶1The First Additional District Munsif/Executing Court, Tiruchirappalli.

2.The Section Officer, VR Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. K.MURALI SHANKAR

,J.

csm Dated : 06.12.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 06.12.2023 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR T.B.Srinivasan ... Petitioner/ Petitioner/ Decree holder Vs. T.Muruganandam ... Respondent/ Respondent/

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.