R.Geetha v. The Sub Registrar

ORDER This Writ Petition is taken up for final hearing at the time of admission with the consent of the learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Counsel for State of TN for the respondent.

¶2The petitioners are before this Court against the impugned Refusal Slip dated 30.06.2026 passed by the respondent bearing reference in Refusal No.RFL/Palliyadi/44/2026.

¶3The reasons given in the impugned refusal check slip reads as under: gjpTf;F jhf;fy; nra;j nrhj;jhdJ fhyQ;nrd;w uh[kzp mtu;fs; kfs; fPjh thjpahfTk;> fhyQ;nrd;w uh[kzp mtu;fspd; kf;fs; ];Nld;yp kw;wk; N`kyjh MfpNahu;fs; gpujpthjpfshfTk; Nru;e;J gj;kdhg;Guk; Kjd;ik khtl;l cupikapay; ePjpkd;wj;jpy; 165/2014 vz;zhf njhlu;e;j mry; ghf tof;fpd; ,Wjp jPu;g;gpd;gb Nkw;gb %d;W egu;fSf;Fk; $l;lhf cupikg;gl;l nrhj;J vd Mtz thrfq;fspy; cs;sJ. gjpTf;F jhf;fy; nra;ag;gl;l Mtzq;fs; midj;Jk; guprPypf;fg;gl;lJ. mjpy; gj;kdhg;Guk; Kjd;ik khtl;l cupikapay; ePjpkd;w mry; tof;F vz; 165/2014-,y; toq;fg;gl;l ,Wjp epiy jPu;g;ghiz rku;g;gpf;fg;gltpy;iy. khwhf Kjy;epiy jPu;g;ghiz rku;g;gpf;fg;gl;Ls;sJ Nkw;gb Kjy;epiy jPu;g;ghizapy; fPo;fz;lthW cs;sJ.

¶1thjpf;F> tof;F gl;bifr; nrhj;Jf;fspy; 1/3ghfk; cupikAs;snjd;Wk;> mjidg; nghWj;J thjp el;G jpl;G ghu;j;J ghfk; gpupj;Jg; ngw Kjy;epiyj; jPu;g;ghiz gpwg;gpf;fg;gLfpwJ.

¶2nryTj;njhif ,y;iy.

¶3mf;fiwAs;s jug;gpdu;> ,Wjp epiyj;jPu;g;ghizf;F eltbf;if vLj;Jf; nfhs;s Ntz;Lk;. vdNt Nkw;gb Kjy;epiy jPu;g;ghizapd; mbg;gilapy; Mtzk; gjpT Nkw;nfhs;s toptif ,y;iy vd;gjhy; ,Wjpepiy jPu;g;ghiz ngw;W cupa eguhy; gjpTf;F jhf;fy; nra;Ak; nghUl;L ,t;thtzk; jpUg;gg;gLfpwJ.

¶4On perusal of the above refusal check slip and the judgement and decree procured by the petitioners in partition suit between them in O.S.No.165 of 2014 which was decreed on 25.11.2014 by the Principal District Munsif Court, Padmanabapuram indicates that the parties have settled the dispute inter se and have also thereafter executed the partition deed dated 30.06.2026. Therefore, there is no basis for refusing the registration of partition deed. Therefore, the impugned refusal slip is quashed with a direction to the respondent to register the partition deed dated 30.06.2026.

¶5This Writ Petition is disposed of, with the above observations. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. Index : Yes / No

16.07.2026 Internet : Yes / No apd To The Sub Registrar, Palliyadi Registrar Office, Palliyadi, Kanyakumari District.

C.SARAVANAN, J.

apd

16.07.2026

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 16.07.2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN and W.M.P.(MD) Nos.14888 & 14890 of 2026 1. R.Geetha, 2. R.Stanley, 3. R.Hemalatha. ... Petitioners Vs The Sub Registrar, Palliyadi Registrar Office, Palliyadi, Kanyakumari District. ... Respondent PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the impugned refusal check slip in Refusal No. RFL/Palliyadi /44/2026 dated 30.06.2026 passed by the respondent quash the same and consequently direct the respondent to register the partition deed presented by the petitioner dated 30.06.2026. For petitioner : Mr. F.Deepak For respondent : M/s.P.Sudarkodi Natchiyar Counsel for State of TN *****