VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

A.Kulandaivelu(Deceased) v. The Management of Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation(Kumbakonam)Ltd.,

WITHDRAWN DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
20 July 2023
Bench
Battu Devanandauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 21735/2019

Judgment

O R D E R Mr.S.Arunachalam, learned counsel for the petitioners on record submits that he intends to withdraw this Writ Petition as per the instruction of his clients and sought permission.

¶2The statement of the learned counsel is placed on record.

¶3Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

¶4No costs.

20.07.2023 Index : Yes / No NCC : Yes / No CM To,

1.The Management of Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam)Ltd., Rep. By its General Manager, Kumbakonam.

2.The Management of Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam) Ltd., Kumbakonam Region, Rep. By its General Manager, Kumbakonam

BATTU DEVANAND, J. CM W.P.(MD)No.21735 of 2019

20.07.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 20.07.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND W.P.(MD)No.21735 of 2019 A.Kulandaivelu (Deceased) 1.K.Ananthavalli 2.K.Adhithyan 3.K.Sakthivel (Minor) ...Petitioner (The legal heirs of the deceased Kulandaivelu is impleaded as per order dated 20.07.2023 in W.M.P(MD)No.3023 of 2023) Vs. 1. The Management of Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam)Ltd., Rep. By its General Manager, Kumbakonam. 2.The Management of Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam) Ltd., Kumbakonam Region, Rep. By its General Manager, Kumbakonam ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus after calling for the records relating to the order/letter of the 2nd respondent dated 20.09.2019 passed in Letter No.417/ggp-, 5/TNSTC(ku) Nagai/2019 and quash the same and consequently direct the 1st respondent to prosecute the responsible officers of the 2nd and 3rd respondents for having violated the provisions of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 in this case, award cost. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Arunachalam For R1 & R2 : Mr.D.Sivaraman

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.