VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

S.Mani v. J.Jebamoni Dhas

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
10 April 2023
Bench
G.Ilangovanauthor
Case no.
CRL OP(MD) 19236/2022

Judgment

O R D E R

This petition has been filed to call for the records pertaining to the order passed in Crl M.P No. 4176/2022 in S.T.C No. 712/2016 dated

05.08.2022 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.1, Padmanabapuram.

¶2The petitioner is facing trial before the Court below and several witnesses were examined in chief on various dates. Due to the non availability of the necessary documents, the petitioner's counsel did not cross-examine the witness P.W.1 in full. Thereafter, the petitioner filed the petition under Section 311 of Cr.P.C., to recall the above said witness and the same was dismissed on 05.08.2022 on flimsy reason. Hence, this petition is filed.

¶3The learned counsel for the respondent submitted that several opportunities were given to the petitioner to cross examine the witness the P.W.1 and the same was not utilized by the petitioner.

¶4Heard both sides.

¶5Perusal of records shows that petitioner is facing serious offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act and the case is pending from the year 2016. Therefore, one more opportunity should be given to the petitioner to cross examine P.W.1.

¶6Considering the fact that petitioner is facing trial under Section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act, without cross examination of the witness P.W.1, a fair judgment may not be possible. On the sole ground, one more opportunity is given to the petitioner on stringent condition. The petitioner is directed to pay Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand Only), as cost to P.W.1 to the credit of S.T.C.No.712 of 2016 within a week from the date of receipt of copy of this order. On such payment, the trial Court may fix the date for cross examine the witness of P.W.1. On that date the petitioner's counsel must cross examine the P.W.1 without fail. If any failure is noticed on the part of the petitioner's counsel, his further right of cross examination of P.W.1 will be forfeited forever.

¶7With the above said direction, this petition stands allowed and the order passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.1, Padmanabapuram, in Crl M.P No. 4176/2022 in S.T.C No. 712/2016, dated 05.08.2022, is quashed. Consequently, the connected Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

10.04.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No TTA To learned Judicial Magistrate No.1, Padmanabapuram G.ILANGOVAN. J. TTA

10.04.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 10.04.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN and Crl.M.P(MD).No.12990 of 2022 S.Mani ... Petitioner Vs. J.Jebamoni Dhas ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, to call for the records relating to the impugned order dated 05.08.2022 in Crl M.P No. 4176/2022 in S.T.C No. 712/2016 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.1, Padmanabapuram and set aside the same. For Petitioner : Mr.V.K.Sathiyamurthy For Respondent : Mr.H.Thayumanaswamy

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.