VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

M/S.Dhanamani Hall v. The Chief Commissioner of Income Tax

ALLOWED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
29 September 2023
Bench
S Justice S.Srimathyauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 20790/2023

Judgment

ORDER This writ petition is filed challenging the impugned order, dated

23.02.2023 with a consequential direction to the respondent to reduce the interest.

¶2Heard Mr.V.Malaiyendran, the Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, Mr.N.Dilip Kumar, the Learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent and perused the material documents available on record.

¶3The contention of the petitioner is that the petitioner came into existence from 01.04.2006 only. However, the respondent has calculated the Tax and other interest for a period from 01.04.2002. Therefore, the impugned order is liable to be quashed.

¶4By taking all facts into consideration, this matter is remitted back to the concerned authorities to consider the issue, that is raised by the petitioner. The exercise shall be completed within a period of Six weeks, from the date of receipt of a copy of the order. No Costs. Index : Yes / No

29.09.2023 Internet : Yes NCC : Yes / No

ksa To The Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Government of India, Income Tax Department, Ministry of Finance, CCIT, Madurai.

S.SRIMATHY, J ksa

29.09.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 29.09.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY M/s.Dhanamani Hall Represented by its Partner, M.Meenakshi Sundaram. ... Petitioner Vs. The Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Government of India, Income Tax Department, Ministry of Finance, CCIT, Madurai. ... Respondent PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the respondent in ITBA / COM /F/ 17/2022-23 /1050072123 (1) dated 23.02.2023 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondent to reduce the interest. For Petitioner : Mr.V.Malaiyendran For Respondent : Mr.N.Dilip Kumar, Standing Counsel

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.