- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 13 October 2023
- Bench
- P.B. Balaji
- Case no.
- CRP(MD) 1894/2019
Judgment
ORDER The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that pending the Civil Revision Petition, the suit in O.S.No.119 of 2009 was disposed of, on 08.03.2023. Hence, he would submit that nothing survives for adjudication.
¶2The learned counsel for the first respondent is present.
¶3Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the instant Civil Revision Petition stands dismissed as infructuous.. There shall be no order as to cost. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
Index:Yes/No
13.10.2023 Internet:Yes/No NCC:Yes/No Ls To
¶1The First Additional Sub Judge, Nagercoil.
2.The Section Officer, VR Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. P.B.BALAJI,J. Ls
13.10.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 13.10.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.BALAJI and C.M.P(MD)No.9691 of 2019 Ida Mary ... Petitioner /Petitioner / 5th defendant .Vs. 1.Sumathy 2.Arul Prakash 3.Kevinchind ... Respondents 1to 3 / Respondents 1 to3/ Plaintiffs ( R2&R3 are minor rep. by R1 of their mother) 4.Leons Mary @ Baby 5.Louis Mary @ Thangam 6.Grace Mary 7.Mary Mathaleni ... Respondents 4 to 7 / Respondents/ Defendants PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the fair and decretal order, dated 04.06.2019, in I.A.No.1 of 2019 in O.S.No.119 of 2009, on the file of the First Additional Sub Judge, Nagercoil. For Petitioner : Mr.N.S.Ramakrishnadass For Respondents :Mr.S.Xavier Rajini for R1 : R2 to R7 given up
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.