VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

R.Mary Stella v. The Superintendent of Police

DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
12 October 2023
Bench
G.Ilangovanauthor
Case no.
CRL OP(MD) 15912/2023

Judgment

O RDER

These Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking to quash summon as against the petitioner in P1/9234/2023, dated 23.08.2023 issued by the second respondent and consequently direct to confiscated the speakers in terms of Sec.3A of Tamil Nadu Nuisance Act.

2.Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has preferred a complaint before the second respondent to remove the cone speakers used in that area which causes nuisance. Since no action was taken, she has filed W.P.(MD)No.8640 of 2022 and the same was allowed. Even after, the respondent has not taken any action to remove the speakers, instead, issued a summon to the petitioner to appear for enquiry. Seeking quashment of the summon, this petition came to be filed.

¶3Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the respondents.

¶4Learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) submitted that on the basis of the complaint given by the petitioner herein that violating the order of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in using the loud speakers, the some persons alleged to have placed loud speakers in that area, summon has been issued to the petitioner. She refused to appear before the respondent claiming that no such complaint has been given her.

¶5If no such complaint has been given by the petitioner, she can very well appear before the respondent and give a statement. But without appearing before the respondent, this petition has been filed, seeking quashment of the summons. The petitioner is directed to appear before the respondent and give a statement by setting out all the facts.

¶6With this direction, this Criminal Original Petition stands disposed of.

12.10.2023 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No pnn G.ILANGOVAN. J. pnn To

1.The Superintendent of Police, Kanyakumari District.

2.The Sub Inspector of Police, Marthandam Police Station, Kanyakumari District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. Crl.O.P.(MD) No.15912 of 2023

12.10.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 12.10.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN Crl.O.P.(MD) No.15912 of 2023 R.Mary Stella ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police, Kanyakumari District. 2.The Sub Inspector of Police, Marthandam Police Station, Kanyakumari District. ... Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, to quash summon as against the petitioner in P1/9234/2023, dated 23.08.2023 issued by the second respondent and consequently direct to confiscated the speakers in terms of Sec.3A of Tamil Nadu Nuisance Act. For Petitioners : Mr.P.F.Ferlin Castro For Respondents : Mr.M.Vaikkam Karunanithi Government Advocate (Crl.side)

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.