VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Sundar Raj v. The Manager

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
30 August 2023
Bench
The Chief Justice, C.Kumarappanauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 21114/2023

Judgment

O R D E R [Order of the Court was made by The Hon'ble CHIEF JUSTICE] We have heard Mr.S.Muthukrishnan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.S.Babu, learned Standing Counsel, appearing for the respondent – Bank.

¶2The petitioner is challenging the possession notice issued under Section 13(4) of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002.

¶3Section 13(4) of the said Act only indicates symbolic possession.

¶4The petitioner has a remedy before the Debts Recovery Tribunal. It is for the petitioner to avail the alternative remedy.

¶5In that event, all the contentions are kept open.

¶6Learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent – Bank submits that learned Chief Judicial Magistrate has also passed an order under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act.

¶7The said order is not assailed in this writ petition. Even otherwise, the said order can also be challenged before the Debts Recovery Tribunal.

¶8The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

[S.V.G., .C.J.] [C.K., J.]

30.08.2023 NCC : Index : Internet :

krk THE HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE and C.KUMARAPPAN , J . krk and W.M.P.(MD) Nos.17516, 17517 & 17519 of 2023

30.08.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 30.08.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.SANJAY V.GANGAPURWALA, CHIEF JUSTICE and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN and W.M.P.(MD) Nos.17516, 17517 & 17519 of 2023 Sundar Raj ... Petitioner -vs- 1.The Manager Jana Small Finance Bank 74, Lucky Land Plaza Salai Road, Trichy - 18 2.The Authorized Officer Jana Small Finance Bank 74, Lucky Land Plaza Salai Road, Trichy - 18 ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of certiorari calling for the records of the second respondent possession notice dated 24.06.2023 issued under Section 13(2) of SARFAESI ACT r/w Rule 3 of the Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules 2002 and quash the same as illegal. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Muthukrishnan For Respondents : Mr.S.Babu, Standing Counsel

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.