VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Sai Sukran Ventures Pvt. Ltd., v. The Director of Town and Country Planning

ALLOWED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
19 December 2023
Bench
G.R.Swaminathanauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 21101/2023

Judgment

ORDER Heard both sides.

¶2The petition mentioned site was ear-marked as "Park" in the Detailed Development Plan published in the year 2005. Consequential acquisition steps were not taken within three years. Section 38 of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971, reads as follows: " 38. Release of land.-If within three years from the date of the publication of the notice in the Tamil Nadu Government Gazette under section 26 or section 27-

(a) no acquisition of land as provided in Sub-Section (2) of Section 37 is published in respect of any land reserved, allotted or designated for any purpose specified in a regional plan, master plan, [Detailed Development Plan or New Town Development Plan or a Land Pooling Area Development Scheme covered by such notice; or

(b) such land is not acquired by agreement, such land shall be deemed to be released from such reservation, allotment or designation: Provided that the Government may, by notification, extend the period for such time as they may think proper, but such extended period shall, in no case, exceed five years.]."

¶3Applying the statutory mandate, it is declared that the reservation made in respect of the petition mentioned land stands lapsed and released. The respondents are directed to make consequential changes in the relevant records.

¶4Accordingly, the Writ Petition is allowed. No costs. .

19.12.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No TSG To

1.The Director of Town and Country Planning. 807, Anna Salai, Chennai, Chennai District.

2.The Member Secretary, Dindigul Town and Country Planning Authority, Dindigul District.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. TSG

19.12.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 19.12.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN M/s.Sai Sukran Ventures Private Limited, Represented by its Managing Director, Naresh Subramani ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Director of Town and Country Planning, 807, Anna Salai, Chennai, Chennai District. 2.The Member Secretary, Dindigul Town and Country Planning Authority, Dindigul District. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of declaration, to declare the reservation made in respect of the petitioner's land in Old T.S.No. 1685/part, New Survey No.1685/0, Ward 6, Block 43, Bodinaickanpatty Dindigul District, forming part of the Bodinaickanpatty Detailed Development plan to have lapsed in light of Sec.38 of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act , 1971 (TN Act 35 of 1974). For Petitioner : Mr.M.Mahaboob Athiff For Respondents : Mr.S.Ra.Ramachandran, Additional Government Pleader

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.