VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Sivaperumal v. Valli

ALLOWED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
31 August 2023
Bench
K.K. Ramakrishnanauthor
Case no.
CRL MP(MD) 12584/2023

Judgment

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Thirty First day of August Two Thousand and Twenty Three PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice K.K. RAMAKRISHNAN in CRL.R.C.(MD).No.972 of 2023 SIVAPERUMAL ... PETITIONER/RESPONDENT/ RESPONDNET

Vs 1 VALLI 2 MINOR.THEIVANAYAGI 3 MINOR.DHARMARAJ ... RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS/ PETITIONERS (RESPONDENT NO.2 & 3 ARE MINORS REPRESENTED

THROUGH

THEIR MOTHER/NATURAL GUARDIAN NAMELY THE 1ST RESPONDEN) Petition filed praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court may be pleased to suspend the conviction and sentence imposed upon the petitioner vide dated 24.07.2023 made in Crl.M.P.No.28 of 2020 in M.C.No.09 of 2018 on the file of the Additional District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate,Vedasandur,Dindigul District pending disposal of the Criminal Revision Case in the interest of justice and thereby render justice. PRAYER IN CRL.R.C.(MD).No.972 of 2023: To call for the records and set aside the order dated 24.07.2023 made in Cr.L.M.P.No.28 of 2020 in M.C.No.09 of 2018, on the file of the Additional District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Vedansandur, Dindigul District. Order : This petition coming up for orders on this day, upon perusing the petition filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.SENTHIL MURUGAN C, Advocate for the petitioner, while admitting the Crl RC., the court made the following order:- This petition is filed to suspend the sentence imposed on the petitioner by the learned Additional District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Vedasandur, Dindigul District in Crl.M.P.No.28 of 2020 in M.C.No.09 of 2018 dated 24.07.2023, pending disposal of the above Criminal Revision Case.

¶2The petitioner herein is the husband of the first respondent, he is confined in prison from 24.07.2023 for his failure to pay the maintenance award amount granted by the trial Court. Therefore, he was convicted and sentenced to undergo 11 months simple imprisonment.

¶3The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the trial Court miserably failed to appreciate the evidence that the first respondent is enjoying the ancestral property of the petitioner and earning sufficient income by doing agricultural activities. The learned Additional District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Vedasandur, Dindigul District, has awarded maintenance amount of Rs.11,000/- to the respondent which is exorbitant. Further he submitted that the Court below without granting sufficient time for complying the order passed by trial Court. The petitioner has already filed the revision case before this Court, challenging the quantum of the maintenance and the same is pending in Crl.M.P.(MD).No.6463 of 2023 in Crl.R.C.(MD).SR.No.12460 of 2023. The Court below sentenced the petitioner only on its own presumption and assumption. Hence, he seeks to suspend the sentence imposed on the petitioner.

¶4This Court has carefully considered the learned counsel for the petitioner and also perused the materials available on record.

¶5Considering the submission of the petitioner that the first respondent is enjoying the ancestral property of the petitioner and earning sufficient income from the said property and he is ready to deposit a sum of Rs.75,000/-, this Court prima facie satisfied that there are arguable points involved in this Criminal Revision and further the criminal revision is not likely to be taken up for final hearing in the near future and as such, this Court is of the considered view that the petitioner herein is in custody from 24.07.2023, hence, the petitioner is entitled to the relief of grant of suspension of sentence.

¶6Accordingly, the relief of suspension of sentence is granted to the petitioner on the following conditions:-

(i) The petitioner shall deposit a sum of Rs.75,000/- before the learned Additional District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate, Vedasandur, Dindigul District.

(ii) The petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Additional District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate, Vedasandur, Dindigul District;

(iii) The sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the trial Court may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank Pass Book to ensure their identity; and

sd/-

31/08/2023

/ TRUE COPY /

01 /09/2023

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S. )

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

Madurai - 625 023. sbn TO

1.THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MUNSIF CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, VEDASANDUR, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

¶2DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, DINDIGUL.

3.THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON, MADURAI. +1 CC to M/s.C.SENTHIL MURUGAN, Advocate ( SR-13005[I] dated 31/08/2023 ) ORDER IN in CRL.R.C.(MD).No.972 of 2023 Date :31/08/2023 RK (01/09/2023) 5P / 5C Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.