VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Balasubramani, v. The Commissioner,

DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
28 April 2023
Bench
B.Pugalendhiauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 17006/2018

Judgment

ORDER This writ petition is filed for a writ of mandamus directing the 4th respondent to pass an order of recovery of penalty amount as per Rule 36 of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulations) Act, 1957.

2.Pending this writ petition, 4th respondent / the Revenue Divisional Officer, Karur has passed orders in Ni.Mu.Ka.Na.Ma.A1/4557/2016, dated 23.07.2018.

3.It is seen from records that the petitioner has subsequently challenged the above order of the Revenue Divisional Officer before this Court in WP(MD)No.11392 of 2019.

4.In view of the subsequent developments, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

28.04.2023 Internet : Yes / No dsk To

1.The Commissioner, Department of Geology and Mining, Guindy, Chennai – 600 032.

2.The District Collector, Karur, Karur District.

3.The Assistant Director, Department of Geology and Mining, Karur, Karur District.

4.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Karur, Karur District.

5.The Tahsildar, Manmangalam, Taluk, Karur District.

B.PUGALENDHI, J. dsk

28.04.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated: 28.04.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI Balasubramani ... Petitioner Vs 1.The Commissioner, Department of Geology and Mining, Guindy, Chennai – 600 032. 2.The District Collector, Karur, Karur District. 3.The Assistant Director, Department of Geology and Mining, Karur, Karur District. 4.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Karur, Karur District. 5.The Tahsildar, Manmangalam, Taluk, Karur District. 6.A.Somasundaram 7.Saminathan 8.Kalandhi 9.K.Vivekananthan ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus directing 4th respondent to pass an order of recovery of the penalty amount as per Rule 36 of the Mines and Minerals Act against the respondents 6 to 9 by illegal quarry operations form the petitioner's land situated in Survey Nos.131 and 132 at Punjaipugalur Village, Manmangalam Taluk, Karur District based on the proceedings of the 3rd respondent dated 18.04.2018. For Petitioner : Mr.S.M.Mohan Gandhi For Respondent : Mr. J.K.Jayaseelan, Nos.1 to 5 Government Advocate For Respondent : Mr.S.Mahesh Babu Nos.6 to 8 For Respondent : Mr.K.Govindarajan No.9

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.