- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 1 November 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan
- Case no.
- CONT P(MD) 1774/2023
Judgment
O R D E R The learned counsel on either side inform the Court that the order passed by this Court has been complied with.
2.Recording the said submission, this contempt petition is closed.
01.11.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No ias To:-
1.Sukitha, The Revenue Divisional Officer, Office of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Sivagangai.
2.Gopinath, The Tahsildar, Office of the Tahsildar, Ilayangudi, Sivagangai District.
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. ias Cont.P.(MD)No.1774 of 2023 in W.P.(MD)No.6979 of 2023
01.11.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 01.11.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN Cont.P.(MD)No.1774 of 2023 in W.P.(MD)No.6979 of 2023 M.Mutharasu ... Petitioner Vs. 1.Sukitha, The Revenue Divisional Officer, Office of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Sivagangai. 2.Gopinath, The Tahsildar, Office of the Tahsildar, Ilayangudi, Sivagangai District. ... Respondents Prayer: Contempt petition is filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the contemnors / respondents herein for the willful, wanton and utter disregard to the order passed by this Court in W.P.(MD)No.6979 of 2023 dated 29.03.2023 under the Contempt of Courts Act. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Ramasundarvijayaraj For Respondents : Mr.K.Balasubramani, Spl. Government Pleader.
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.