P.Manoharan v. The Superintending Engineer

ORDER Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the prayer sought for in the writ petition has become infructuous. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.

¶2In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

01.12.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes ssb

B.PUGALENDHI, J. ssb To The Superintending Engineer, Public Works Department (Buildings), Construction and Maintenance Circle, Cantonment, Trichy. Dated : 01.12.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 01.12.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI and W.M.P(MD).Nos.15042 to 15044 of 2018 P.Manoharan .. Petitioner Vs. 1.The Superintending Engineer, Public Works Department (Buildings), Construction and Maintenance Circle, Cantonment, Trichy. 2.R.P.Periyasamy & Company, Rep.by its Partner, S.Thenmozhi .. Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of of Declaration, declaring that tender process of the first respondent dated 11.06.2018 pursuant to the tender notice No. 46/2017-2018/SE/B(C&M) dated 20.03.2018 as null and void and consequently, declare the selection process of the second respondent as successful bidder as null and void. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Mathavan For Respondents : Mr.G.V.Vairom Santhosh Additional Government Pleader for R1