- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 21 November 2023
- Bench
- N. Anand Venkatesh
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 21780/2021
Judgment
O R D E R This Writ Petition has been filed for the issue of writ of mandamus directing the respondents to survey and demarcate the plot that was assigned in favour of the petitioner based on the representation dated
16.11.2021.
¶2Heard the learned counsel on either side.
¶3The case of the petitioner is that Plot No.40 was assigned in favour of the petitioner through proceedings of the second respondent dated 14.06.2016. According to the petitioner, the patta and the layout of the house site alone was issued and there was no demarcation on the survey conducted in the house site. The petitioner wanted to construct a house in Plot No.40. Therefore, he made a representation requesting for survey and for demarcation of the boundaries. Since the same was not considered, the present Writ Petition was filed before this Court.
¶4The learned Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the respondents produced the written instructions received from the second respondent. The relevant portions are extracted hereunder: ",e;Neu;tpy; kDjhuu;fs; $wpa Nkw;fz;l Gyvz;fspy; cs;s kid vz;.40> 41 Mfpatw;wpy; epymsit nra;J jUkhW gukf;Fb jdptl;lhl;rpau;
(Mjpe)
mYtyfj;jpy;
17.11.2021
md;W kDr;nra;Js;sdu;. Nkw;fz;l Gyvz; cs;s kid vz;fs;>40>41 Mjpjpuhtplu; jdptl;lhl;rpau; nray;Kiw Miz vz;.ef.m/2057/1984> ehs; 30.04.1994-d;gb kid vz;.40-y; jpU.Kj;JghY> j/ng.fhsp vd;gtUf;Fk;> kid vz;.41-y; jpU.kfhypq;fk;> j/ng.MWKfk; vd;gtu;fspd; ngaupy; xg;gil Miz toq;fp cj;jutplg;gl;Ls;sJ. ,e;Neu;tpy; ghu;it 2-y; fhZk; fbjj;jpy; kDjhuu; Kj;Jkhup (1) MWKfk; (2) MfpNahu;fspd; ngaupy; cs;s gl;lh khWjy; cj;juT ,t;tYtyfk; %yk; toq;fg;gltpy;iy. vdNt> kDjhuu; NfhupathW epymsit nra;a ,aytpy;iy vd;w tpguj;jpid njuptpj;J kDjhuu;fSf;F fbjk; mDg;gg;gl;Ls;sJ. Gukf;Fb tl;lk;> fhl;Lgukf;Fb F&g;> Gyvz;. 357/1A> 358/1A> 359/2> 55.56 tp];jPuzk; 7.80.0 Vf;fu; epyk;
gukf;Fb
Mjpjpuhtpl
jdptl;lhl;rpau; ef.m/2057/1984 ehs;.30.04.1994-d;gb ifafg;gLj;jg;gl;L fhl;Lgukf;Fb F&g; fpuhk ej;jk; fzf;fpw;F Mjpjpuhtplu;
fhydp(H.O)
vd
khWjy; nra;ag;gl;Ls;sJ. NkYk; Nkw;gb GykhdJ gjpTfs; VJk; Nkw;nfhs;sg;glhky; jw;fhypfkhf epWj;jp (Held Over) itf;fg;gl;Ls;sJ vd fpuhk fzf;fpy; jhf;fyhfp tUfpwJ. vdNt>
,t;tof;fpd; thjpfs;/kDjhuu;fSf;F gl;lh toq;fg;gl;ljw;fhd Mtzq;fs;
,t;tYtyf
Nfhg;gpy;
,y;yhj fhuzj;jpdhYk;> fhl;Lgukf;Fb F&g;> fpuhk ej;jk; fzf;fpy; jw;fhypfkhf epWj;jp (Held Over) itf;fg;gl;Ls;sJ vd jhf;fyhfp tUtjhYk;> kDjhuu;fSf;F epymsit nra;a ,aytpy;iy."
¶5On going through the written instructions along with the relevant documents, it is seen that as per the proceedings of the second respondent dated 30.04.1994, Plot No.40 was assigned in favour of one Muthubalu son of Kali. The name of the petitioner is K.Muthumari, son of Kalimuthu. In view of this discrepancy, the second respondent is not in a position to survey and demarcate the property as requested by the petitioner.
¶6In view of the same, there shall be a direction to the second respondent to conduct an enquiry and ascertain the actual beneficiary as per the proceedings of the second respondent dated 30.04.1994. If ultimately, the second respondent is able to ascertain that the assignment was made in favour of the petitioner, the request made by the petitioner for survey and demarcation of the boundaries can be carried out. In any case, the decision shall be conveyed to the petitioner by the second respondent within a period of six (6) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
¶7This Writ Petition is disposed of with the above directions. No costs.
21.11.2023 NCC:yes/no Index:yes/no Internet:yes/no tsg To
1.The District Adi-Dravidar Welfare Officer, Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram.
2.The Special Tahsildar, Adi-Dravidar Welfare Office, Paramakudi, Ramanathapuram District.
N.ANAND VENKATESH, J. tsg
21.11.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 21.11.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH K.Muthumari ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Adi-Dravidar Welfare Officer, Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram. 2.The Special Tahsildar, Adi-Dravidar Welfare Office, Paramakudi, Ramanathapuram District. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to survey and demarcate petitioner house site plot comprised in Plot No.40 in Survey Nos.357/1A, 358/1A, 359/21-55 and 56 admeasuring to an extent of 0.02 Cents wherein situated at Kattuparamakudi Village, Paramakudi Taluk, Ramanathapuram District, based on the representation dated 16.11.2021 submitted to the 2nd Respondent within the time frame that may be fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.A.Vadivel For R-1 & R-2 : Mr.R.Ragavendran, Government Advocate
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.