- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 21 July 2026
- Bench
- C. Saravanan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 20544/2026
Judgment
ORDER M/s.P.Sudarkodi Natchiyar, learned Counsel for State of TN, takes notice for the respondent.
¶2This Writ Petition is being disposed of at the time of admission with the consent of the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Counsel for State of TN for the respondent.
¶3In this Writ Petition, the petitioner has challenged the Impugned Order in FORM GST DRC-07 bearing Ref.No. GSTIN 33AASFB7501M1Z7/2020-21 dated 22.02.2025 of the respondent, wherein the demand proposed in Show Cause Notice in DRC 01 dated 07.02.2024 has been confirmed. After the issuance of the Impugned Order, the petitioner has filed an application dated 31.07.2025 for rectification of the Impugned Assessment Order dated 22.02.2025, which came to be rejected by order dated 10.10.2025.
¶4By the Show Cause Notice in DRC 01 dated 07.02.2024, the petitioner was also called upon to appear for personal hearing. However, the petitioner had not taken advantage of the same and thus, suffered the impugned Order dated
22.02.2025.
¶5It is noticed that the limitation for filing an appeal under Section 107 of the respective GST enactments, 2017 against the impugned Order has already expired. The present Writ Petition has been filed only on 17.07.2026.
¶6At this stage, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Petitioner is willing to pre-deposit 25% of the disputed tax as a condition for de novo adjudication.
¶7The learned counsel for the petitioner has also made an endorsement to that effect in the Court Bundle, which is extracted hereunder:- "The petitioner pay to 25% disputed tax as instructed by the Hon'ble High Court."
¶8In view of the above, the case is remitted back to the respondent to pass a fresh order subject to the petitioner depositing 25% of the disputed tax in cash from the petitioner's Electronic Cash Register within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
¶9Within such time, the Petitioner shall also file a reply to the Show Cause Notice in DRC 01, dated 07.02.2024 together with requisite documents to substantiate the case by treating the Impugned Order dated 22.02.2025 as an addendum to the Show Cause Notice dated 07.02.2024.
¶10In case the petitioner complies with the above stipulations, the respondent shall proceed to pass a final order on merits and in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a period of three (3) months of such reply / pre-deposit.
¶11In case the petitioner fails to comply with any of the stipulations, the respondent is at liberty to proceed against the petitioner to recover the tax in accordance with law as if this Writ Petition was dismissed in limine today.
¶12Needless to state, before passing any such order, the respondent shall give due notice to the petitioner.
¶13This Writ Petition stands disposed of with the above observations. No costs. Consequently, connected Writ Miscellaneous Petition is closed. Index : Yes / No
21.07.2026 Internet : Yes / No apd To The Deputy State Tax Offrcer - 1 / Deputy Commercial Tax Officer, Rajapalayam -I Assessment Circle, Virudhunagar.
C.SARAVANAN, J.
apd
21.07.2026
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 21.07.2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN and W.M.P.(MD) No.15217 of 2026 Tvl Balaji Constructions, rep. by its Parner R.Vengadesan. ... Petitioner Vs The Deputy State Tax Offrcer - 1 / Deputy Commercial Tax Officer, Rajapalayam -I Assessment Circle, Virudhunagar. ... Respondent PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the impugned assessment order on the file of respondent vide GSTIN 33AASFB7501M1Z7/2020-21 and in summary order Reference No ZD330225230164Y dated 22.02.2025 and quash the same as illegal and devoid of merits and direct the respondent to redo the assessment proceedings for the year 2020-21. For petitioner : Mr. Raja Karthikeyan For respondent : M/s.P.Sudarkodi Natchiyar Counsel for State of TN *****
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.