- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 27 September 2023
- Bench
- B.Pugalendhi
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 21546/2023
Judgment
O R D E R The petitioners, with a grievance that their application dated 06.01.2022 for grant of joint patta has not been considered by the respondent have filed this writ petition for a Mandamus to direct the respondent to issue a joint patta to the petitioners.
2.Mr.G.V.Vairam Santhosh, learned Additional Government Pleader, who takes notice for the respondents submits that based on the petitioner's application, enquiry has already been conducted and orders would be passed within a reasonable time.
3.Considering the rival submissions made, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent to conclude the proceedings and pass orders on the petitioners' application within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.
27.09.2023 NCC :Yes/No Index :Yes/No Internet:Yes vrn To The Tahsildar, Vedasanthur Taluk, Dindigul District.
B.PUGALENDHI, J. vrn
27.09.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 27.09.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI 1. A.D.Balasubramanian 2. Kannan A D ... Petitioners Vs The Tahsildar, Vedasanthur Taluk, Dindigul District. ... Respondent PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to issue a joint patta to the petitioners for the subject properties in Survey No. 936/1B, 936/2B2A, 935/2A1A, Vedasanthur Village, Dindigul District. For petitioner : Mr.J.Barathan For Respondent : Mr.G.V.Vairam Santhosh Additional Government Pleader
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.