VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

R.Amutha v. The District Revenue Officer

DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
19 September 2023
Bench
B.Pugalendhiauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 22738/2023

Judgment

ORDER The petitioner has field this writ petition as against the order passed by the Sub Collector.

2.Learned Counsel for the petitioner fairly submitted that as against the order impugned, the petitioner has already filed a revision before the District Revenue Officer.

3.Since the petitioner has already invoked the efficacious remedy which is available under the Patta Passbook Act, this writ petition stands disposed of, with liberty to the petitioner to raise all the grounds raised in this petition before the District Revenue Officer in the pending revision petition. The revisional authority shall consider the case of the petitioner, independently and shall take a decision, on merits and in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. Index :

19.09.2023 NCC : gk To

1.The District Revenue Officer, Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram.

2.The Assistant Collector, Paramakudi, Ramanathapuram District.

3.The Tahsildar, Paramakudi Taluk, Ramanathapuram District.

B.PUGALENDHI, J. gk

19.09.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 19.09.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI and WMP(MD)Nos.18992, 18996 of 2023 R.Amudha ... Petitioner v. 1.The District Revenue Officer, Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram. 2.The Assistant Collector, Paramakudi, Ramanathapuram District. 3.The Tahsildar, Paramakudi Taluk, Ramanathapuram District. 4.S.K.Sakeerapani Nadar ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the second respondent's order in Pa.Mu(A3).4232/2023 dated 21.07.2023 and quash the same and consequently, directing the third respondent not to alter the revenue records till the disposal of Na.Ka.No.B5/34161/2023 dated 12.07.2023 on the file of the first respondent related to S.No.260/7A, T.S.No.15/11 to an extent of 0.39 cents ward E, Block 5, Eamaneswaram, Paramakudi Taluk, Ramanathapuram District. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Muthusamy For Respondents : Mrs.D.Farjana Ghoushia, Special Government Pleader for R.1 to R.3 *****

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.