- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 30 October 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 21404/2023
Judgment
ORDER The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition. She also made an endorsement to this effect.
¶2In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
30.10.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No MGA To
1.The Additional Chief Secretary to Government, Revenue and Disaster Management Department, St.George Fort, Chennai -9.
2.The District Collector, Thoothukudi District, Thoothukudi.
3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kayathar Division,
4.The Tahsildar,
5.The Inspector of Police, Kayathar Police Station,
6.The Village Administrative Officer, Sivanayapuram Village,
7.The Manager, JSW Renew Energy Two Limited, (Campus Office), Zero Point, Annai Readymix Plant, Savalaperi, Kayathar Taluk,
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. MGA and W.M.P(MD)Nos.17819 & 17820 of 2023
30.10.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 30.10.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and W.M.P(MD)Nos.17819 & 17820 of 2023 Rajkumar ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The State represented by The Additional Chief Secretary to Government, Revenue and Disaster Management Department, St.George Fort, Chennai -9. 2.The District Collector, Thoothukudi District, Thoothukudi. 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kayathar Division, 4.The Tahsildar, 5.The Inspector of Police, Kayathar Police Station, 6.The Village Administrative Officer, Sivanayapuram Village, 7.JSW Renew Energy Two Limited, (Campus Office), By its Manager, Zero Point, Annai Readymix Plant, Savalaperi, Kayathar Taluk, ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents restrained the seventh respondent not to using the petitioner's patta land subsequently remove the wind mill materials from the petitioner's patta land based on the petitioner's representation dated 17.07.2023. For Petitioner : Ms.V.Sebastinal Preethi For Respondents : Mr.C.Satheesh Government Advocate for R.1 to R.4 & R.6 Mr.A.Albert James Government Advocate for R.5
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.