- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 21 November 2023
- Bench
- N. Anand Venkatesh
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 21906/2021
Judgment
O R D E R The Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the matter has become infructuous.
¶2Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
21.11.2023 NCC:yes/no Index:yes/no Internet:yes/no tsg
N.ANAND VENKATESH, J. tsg
21.11.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 21.11.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH M.Rajammal ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Authorized Officer, Chief Manager, State Bank of India, Palayamkottai, Tirunelveli 627 002. 2.The Regional Manager, State Bank of India, Thallakulam, Madurai. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to release the security documents back to the petitioner forthwith and close the loan account bearing Account No. 30291174005 and directing the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 30.11.2021. For Petitioner : Mr.R.SM.Suresh For R-1 & R-2 : Mr.C.Ratha Krishnan, Standing Counsel
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.