VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

S.Ramakrishnan v. The Commissioner

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
12 September 2023
Bench
B.Pugalendhiauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 21381/2023

Judgment

ORDER The petitioner has filed this writ petition with a grievance that the information sought for by him under the Right to Information Act has not been provided, despite the second appeal filed by him.

2.The learned standing Counsel appearing for the 1st respondent submits that based on the second appeal filed by the petitioner, the 4th respondent was twice directed to provide the information sought by the petitioner.

3.Considering the submission made on either side, this Court directs the 1st respondent to take action as per Section 20 of the Right to Information Act, in case, the 4th respondent has not provided the information so far.

4.The writ petition is disposed of with the above directions. No costs.

12.09.2023 dsk To

1.The Commissioner, The State Information Commission, No.19, Government Farm House, Nandanam, Chennai – 600 035.

2.The Public Information Officer, Deputy Block Development Officer (Village Panchayat), Dindigul Panchayat Union, Dindigul – 624 003.

3.The Public Information Officer - cum Officer Manager (Development), District Collector Office, Dindigul – 624 004.

4.The Assistant Public Information Officer – cum Village Secretary, Seelapadi Panchayat, Dindigul Panchayat Union, Dindigul District – 624 005.

B.PUGALENDHI, J. dsk

12.09.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 12.09.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI S.Ramakrishnan ... Petitioner Vs 1.The Commissioner, The State Information Commission, No.19, Government Farm House, Nandanam, Chennai – 600 035. 2.The Public Information Officer, Deputy Block Development Officer (Village Panchayat), Dindigul Panchayat Union, Dindigul – 624 003. 3.The Public Information Officer - cum Officer Manager (Development), District Collector Office, Dindigul – 624 004. 4.The Assistant Public Information Officer – cum Village Secretary, Seelapadi Panchayat, Dindigul Panchayat Union, Dindigul District – 624 005. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of mandamus, directing the respondent to furnish the information sought for by the petitioner on the basis of the representation dated 11.04.2023 and 12.05.2023 within the time stipulated by this Court. For petitioner : Mr.A.Aruljenifer For Respondent : Mr.Raguvaran Goplan, No.1 Standing Counsel For Respondent :Mr.C.Baskaran Nos. 2 to 4

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.