VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Vedantu Innovations Private Limited v. Additional Commissioner of Gst and Central Excise,

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
22 July 2026
Bench
M.Dhandapaniauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 20769/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow M.Dhandapani

Judgment

ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the Impugned Show Cause Notice No. 02/2026-27-GST in DIN No.20260659XN00001681BA dated 09.06.2026, issued by the first respondent, and to quash the same as illegal and direct the first respondent to immediately unblock the Electronic Credit Ledger so as to enable the Petitioner to conduct business as usual.

¶2The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the impugned Show Cause Notice proposing reversal of Input Tax Credit under the IGST head, together with interest and penalty under Sections 74 and 74A of the CGST Act, has been issued in an arbitrary manner without proper application of mind. It is submitted that the notice does not disclose the specific basis for invoking Rule 86A of the CGST Rules or the alleged violations committed by the petitioner. The learned counsel would further contend that the petitioner had Page3 of 6 already submitted its explanation; however, the same has not been considered before issuance of the impugned Show Cause Notice, thereby, resulting in violation of the principles of natural justice. It is also submitted that there is absolutely no suppression of facts on the part of the petitioner and, therefore, invocation of the provisions of Sections 74 and 74A of the CGST Act is wholly without jurisdiction. Accordingly, the petitioner seeks appropriate directions from this Court.

¶3The learned Senior Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents would submit that the impugned proceedings are only at the stage of a Show Cause Notice and no final adjudication has yet been made. It is submitted that the petitioner has an effective opportunity to place all its objections and supporting materials before the adjudicating authority, who would consider the same and pass orders strictly in accordance with law. It is further submitted that the blocking of the electronic credit ledger has been effected in exercise of the powers conferred under the CGST Act and the Rules framed thereunder.

¶4Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the rival contentions, this Court is of the view that the petitioner should be afforded an opportunity to place all its objections before the adjudicating authority. Page4 of 6

¶5Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of, by directing the first respondent to conclude the proceedings pursuant to the impugned Show Cause Notice, after affording the petitioner a reasonable opportunity of personal hearing and considering all the objections and documents that may be produced by the petitioner, and thereafter, pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

¶6It is further made clear that the petitioner is at liberty to file an appropriate interim application before the first respondent seeking lifting of the blockage of the electronic credit ledger, and if such an application is filed, the first respondent shall consider and dispose of the same independently, on its own merits and in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible. 22-07-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order smn2 Page5 of 6 To

¶1Additional Commissioner of GST and Central Excise, No. 1, Williams Road, Cantonment, Tiruchirappalli - 620 001.

¶2Principal Commissioner of GST and Central Excise No. 1, Williams Road, Cantonment, Tiruchirappalli - 620 001.

¶3Superintendent of GST and Central Excise, Headquarters Anti-Evasion, Trichy, No. 1, Williams Road, Cantonment, Tiruchirappalli - 620 001. Page6 of 6

M.DHANDAPANI, J. smn2 22-07-2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 6 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 22-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.15418 and 15419 of 2026 Vedantu Innovations Private Limited Represented by its Authorised Signatory, Vamsi Krishna Paruchuri, 3rd Floor, 29/3, Ambigai City Centre, Sasthiri Road, Thillai Nagar, Tiruchirappalli, Tamil Nadu, 620018. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. Additional Commissioner of GST and Central Excise, No. 1, Williams Road, Cantonment, Tiruchirappalli - 620 001. 2. Principal Commissioner of GST and Central Excise No. 1, Williams Road, Cantonment, Tiruchirappalli - 620 001. 3. Superintendent of GST and Central Excise, Headquarters Anti-Evasion, Trichy, No. 1, Williams Road, Cantonment, Tiruchirappalli - 620 001. ..Respondent(s) Writ Petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the Impugned Show Cause Notice No. 02/2026-27-GST in Page2 of 6 DIN. No. 20260659XN00001681BA dated 09.06.2026, issued by the 1st Respondent, and to quash the same as illegal and direct the 1st Respondent to immediately unblock the Electronic Credit Ledger so as to enable the Petitioner to conduct business as usual and pass such other order or orders as this Honble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. For Petitioner(s): Mr.Raghavan Ramabadran For Respondent(s): Mr.R.Gowri Shankar Senior Central Government Standing Counsel

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.