VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

B.Meenal v. The Distrit Backward Classes

CLOSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
12 December 2023
Bench
B.Pugalendhiauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 3430/2017

Judgment

ORDER The petitioner, seeking free electricity service connection for her agricultural land, has filed this writ petition in the year 2017.

¶2Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Electricity Board submits that the electricity connection has already been provided to the petitioner. Therefore, nothing survives in this writ petition.

¶3Recording the said submission, this writ petition is closed. No costs.

12.12.2023 ogy NCC : Yes / No. Index : Yes / No. Internet : Yes / No. To

¶1The District Backward Classes and Minorities Welfare Officer, O/o. The District Backward Classes and Minorities Welfare Office, Sivagangai.

¶2The Executive Engineer, Sivagangai Electricity Distribution Circle, Sivagangai.

¶3The Assistant Executive Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, West Electric Sub Division, Thiruppattur – 630 211 Sivagangai District.

B.PUGALENDHI, J. ogy

12.12.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 12.12.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI B.Meenal ... Petitioner versus 1. The District Backward Classes and Minorities Welfare Officer, O/o. The District Backward Classes and Minorities Welfare Office, Sivagangai. 2. The Executive Engineer, Sivagangai Electricity Distribution Circle, Sivagangai. 3. The Assistant Executive Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, West Electric Sub Division, Thiruppattur – 630 211 Sivagangai District. ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 2nd and 3rd respondents to provide free electricity service connection to the petitioner for the purpose of her agricultural activities in pursuant to the acknowledgement issued by the 3rd respondent in Serial No.30/11-12 dated 24.06.2011 within the period that may be stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.C.Venkatesh Kumar For R1 : Mr.P.T.Thiraviam, Government Advocate For R2 and R3 : Mr.S.Deenadhayalan

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.