VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

K.Rajavel v. Government of Tamilnadu

DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
26 July 2023
Bench
Battu Devanandauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 368/2017

Judgment

O R D E R Mr.V.Kannan, learned counsel for the petitioner on record submits that in view of the subsequent developments after filing this Writ Petition, this Writ Petition has become infructuous.

¶2The statement of the learned counsel is placed on record.

¶3Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

¶4No costs.

¶5Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

26.07.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes NCC : Yes / No RM To

1.The Secretary to Government, Government of Tamilnadu Commercial Tax & Registration Department, Secretariat, Chennai - 9.

2.The Inspector General of Registration, 100, Santhome Main Road, Chennai - 28.

3.The District Registrar Registration Department, Palayamkottai, Tirunelveli - 9, Tirunelveli District.

BATTU DEVANAND, J. RM

26.07.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 26.07.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND and W.M.P(MD)No.276 of 2017 K.Rajavel ...Petitioner Vs. 1.Government of Tamilnadu Rep. by its Secretary to Government, Commercial Tax & Registration Department, Secretariat, Chennai - 9. 2.The Inspector General of Registration, 100, Santhome Main Road, Chennai - 28. 3.The District Registrar Registration Department, Palayamkottai, Tirunelveli - 9, Tirunelveli District. 4.P.Archunan Assistant, District Registrar Office, Palayamkottai, Tirunelveli - 9, Tirunelveli District. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the proceedings of the second respondent in Proceedings No.21000/K1/2016-1 dated 24.12.2016 and consequential promotion and posting order in proceedings of the second respondent in Proceedings No. 21000/K1/2016-2 dated 24.12.2016 and to quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to place the petitioner in the appropriate place in the seniority list of Junior Assistants eligible for promotion to the post of Assistant for the year 2016-2017 and to give promotion to the petitioner to the post of Assistant with all service and monetary benefits. For Petitioner : Mr.V.Kannan For Respondents : Mr.A.Kannan - for R1 to R3 Additional Government Pleader No Appearance - for R4

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.