R.Ganesan v. The Superintending Engineer

ORDER Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the prayer sought for in the writ petition has become infructuous. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.

¶2In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

29.11.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes ssb

B.PUGALENDHI, J. ssb To

1.The Superintending Engineer (Highways), C & M Circle Trichy, Pudukottai Road, Subramaniyapuram, Trichy-20.

2.The Divisional Engineer (Highways), Quality Control Division, Trichy-20. Dated : 29.11.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 29.11.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI and W.M.P.(MD) Nos.3441 to 3443 of 2017 R.Ganesan .. Petitioner Vs. 1.The Superintending Engineer (Highways), C & M Circle Trichy, Pudukottai Road, Subramaniyapuram, Trichy-20. 2.The Divisional Engineer (Highways), Quality Control Division, Trichy-20. .. Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st respondent to accept the tender schedule forms submitted by the petitioner for the works covered in Package No. 65, 69, 71 & 78 of Tender Notification No.9 & 10/2016-2017/HDO dated 30.01.2017 & 31.01.2017 and scrutinize the same without insisting the production of certificate from the 2nd respondent and finalise the tender process in accordance with law. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Arun Jayatram For Respondents : Mr.P.T.Thiraviam Government Advocate