- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 18 August 2023
- Bench
- G.R.Swaminathan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 4771/2017
Judgment
ORDER Heard the learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the official respondents and the learned counsel appearing for the private respondent.
¶2The petitioner challenges the order dated 20.10.2016 passed by the Tahsildar, Ramanathapuram. This order was subsequently suo motu recalled by the Revenue Divisional Officer, Ramanathapuram on 08.06.2017. Therefore, nothing survives for further adjudication in this writ petition.
¶3The Writ Petition is closed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are also closed.
18.08.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No rmi To
1.The District Revenue Officer, Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram.
2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Ramanathapuram, Ramanathapuram District.
3.The Tahsildar, Ramanathapuram, Ramanathapuram District.
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. rmi
18.08.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 18.08.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and M.P.(MD)Nos.3819 & 3820 of 2017 Abdul Cader Buhary ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Revenue Officer, Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Ramanathapuram, Ramanathapuram District. 3.The Tahsildar, Ramanathapuram, Ramanathapuram District. 4.K.Hairudeen Ahmed ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the third respondent in his proceedings T.R. 2016/27/11/000011SD, dated 20.10.2016 and quash the same as illegal. For Petitioner : Mr.B.Saravanan Senior Counsel for Mr.D.Kirubakaran For Respondents : Mr.D.Gandhiraj Special Government Pleader for R1 to R3 : Mr.Meenakshisundaram for Mr.Murugan for R4
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.