- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 21 November 2023
- Bench
- N. Anand Venkatesh
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 22077/2021
Judgment
O R D E R The Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the matter has become infructuous.
¶2Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
21.11.2023 NCC:yes/no Index:yes/no Internet:yes/no tsg To The District Collector, Tiruchirappalli District, Tiruchirappalli.
N.ANAND VENKATESH, J. tsg
21.11.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 21.11.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH and W.M.P.(MD).No.18684 of 2021 Thangapandian ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Tiruchirappalli District, Tiruchirappalli. 2.The City Corporation Commissioner, Tiruchirappalli City Corporation, Tiruchirappalli. 3.The City Corporation Deputy Commissioner, Co-Abisegapuram Division, Tiruchirappalli City Corporation, Tiruchirappalli. 4.Karthikeyan ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 3 not to give any permission to the 4th respondent to install any Over Head Telephone Tower in Plot No.2, ESK Nagar, Kulumani Main Road , Aravanur, Uraiyur, Tiruchirappalli-620003 based on petitioner's representations dated 23.10.2021 and 25.10.2021. For Petitioner : Mr.T.M.Madasamy For R-1 : Mr.R.Ragavendran, Government Advocate For R-2 & R-3 : Mr.Baskaran
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.