VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Udaiyar Poosari @ Udaiyan v. The Commissioner

WITHDRAWN DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
7 September 2023
Bench
S.S. Sundarauthor, D.Bharatha Chakravarthy
Case no.
WP(MD) 21710/2023

Judgment

ORDER (Order of the Court was made by S.S.SUNDAR, J.) The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.

¶2In view of the endorsement so made, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No Costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. [S.S.S.R., J.] [D.B.C., J.]

07.09.2023 Index : Yes / No NCC : Yes/No pm To

1.The Commissioner, Chennai – 24.

2.The District Collector,

3.The Superintendent of Police, Ramathapuram,

4.The District Revenue Officer,

5.The Joint Commissioner,

6.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Tiruvadanai,

7.The Assistant Commissioner,

8.Fit Person / Thakkar, Arulmigu Anuchakudi Sree Kaliyammam Thirukoil, Anuchakudi, Ariyankottai, RS Mangalam Taluk,

S.S.SUNDAR, J. and D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY

, J.

pm W.P(MD)No.21710 of 2023

07.09.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 07.09.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.S.SUNDAR and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY W.P(MD)No.21710 of 2023 and W.M.P(MD)No.18112 of 2023 Udaiyar Poosari @ Udaiyan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Commissioner, Chennai – 24. 2.The District Collector, 3.The Superintendent of Police, Ramathapuram, 4.The District Revenue Officer, 5.The Joint Commissioner, 6.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Tiruvadanai, 7.The Assistant Commissioner, 8.Fit Person / Thakkar, Arulmigu Anuchakudi Sree Kaliyammam Thirukoil, Anuchakudi, Ariyankottai, RS Mangalam Taluk, 9.R.Nagamuthu 10.S.M.A.Saravanan ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1, 5 & 7 to restrain the respondents 9 and 10 from proceeding further with such an unauthorized collection of funds from public in the name of the temple and consequently direct the respondents 1, 5 and 7 to restrain the respondents 9 & 10 from arbitrarily performing Kumbabhisekam ceremony dated 04.09.2023, unless the rights of the villagers and the community people are protected based on the representation given by the petitioner in person dated 10.08.2023 and 26.08.2023. For Petitioner :Mr.K.Jeyamohan For RR1,2,4,5, 7 & 8 :Mr.P.Thilak Kumar, Government Pleader For R-3 & R-6 :Mr.M.Veeranthiran, Government Advocate ***

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.