Rengaraj v. Narayanasamy

ORDER Learned counsels appearing on both sides submit that the suit in O.S.No.66 of 2017 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Sankarankovil, Tirunelveli District, itself was disposed of vide decree and judgment dated 19.01.2021. In view of the same, no further adjudication is required in the present review petition.

¶2In view of the statement made by the respective counsels, in the opinion of this Court, this Civil Revision Petition has become infructuous.

¶3Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

¶4There shall be no order as to costs.

¶5Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

30.11.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes abr To The Subordinate Judge, Sankarankovil, Tirunelveli District. C.R.P.(MD)oNo.2161oofo2019 BATTUoDEVANAND,oJ. abr C.R.P.(MD)oNo.2161oofo2019 Datedo:o30.11.2023 Pageo4oofo4

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 30.11.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND and C.M.P.(MD) No.11349 of 2019 1.Rengaraj 2.Indirani .. Petitioners/Plaintiffs Vs. Narayanasamy .. Respondent/Defendant Prayer: Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to set aside the order and decree dated 26.08.2019 made in I.A.No.4 of 2019 in O.S.No.66 of 2017 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Sankarankovil, Tirunelveli District. For Petitioners : Mr.S.Ramasamy For Respondents : Mr.R.J.Karthick