VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

A.Bhuvaneshwari v. Vallinayagam

CLOSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
29 September 2023
Bench
B.Pugalendhiauthor
Case no.
CONT P(MD) 1833/2023

Judgment

O R D E R

This contempt petition is filed that the order of this Court in W.P.(MD)No.25142 of 2022 dated 07.11.2022 has not been complied with.

2.Today(29.09.2023), when this contempt petition is taken up for hearing, the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondent submits that the order has been complied with and the petitioner's representation has been rejected. He further submits that a copy of the order has also been furnished to the petitioner.

3.Recording the aforesaid submission, this contempt petition is closed.

29.09.2023

Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No vrn To The Thasildar, Taluk Office, Radhapuram Taluk, Tirunelveli. CONT.P.(MD)No.1833 of 2023 B.PUGALENDHI,oJ. vrn Orderomadeoin CONT.P.(MD)No.1833oofo2023 in WP(MD)oNo.25142oofo2022

29.09.2023 4/4https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 29.09.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI in WP(MD) No.25142 of 2022 A.Bhuvaneshwari ... Petitioner Vs Mr.Vallinayagam, Thasildar, Taluk Office, Radhapuram Taluk, Tirunelveli. ...Contemnor/ Respondent PRAYER: Contempt Petition filed under Section 10 of the Contempt of Courts Act, praying this Court to punish the contemnor / 3rd Respondent for his willful disobedience of the order passed in W.P.(MD)No.25142 of 2022 dated 07.11.2022. For Petitioner :Mr.T.Selvan For Respondent :Mrs.D.Farjana Ghoushia Special Government Pleader

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.